Against Method
Wishlist
Gently read. May have name of previous ownership, or ex-library edition. Binding tight; spine straight and smooth, with no creasing; covers clean and crisp. Minimal signs of handl…
Book Summary
Paul Feyerabend's 'Against Method' is a provocative critique of the scientific method, arguing that there is no single set of rules governing scientific progress. This edition, in gently used condition, offers a foundational text for philosophy of science students and anyone questioning how knowledge is made. It challenges the idea of a universal scientific method and defends theoretical pluralism.
This book is not available
Store  |
Condition |
Deals & Coupons | Price |
Est. Shipping |
Total |
Buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorry we could not find any result for “9781844674428” | ||||||
About Against Method
Against Method by Paul Feyerabend is a landmark work in the philosophy of science, first published in 1975. Feyerabend argues against the existence of a universal scientific method, proposing instead that science progresses through an anarchistic approach where 'anything goes.' He uses historical case studies, notably Galileo's defense of heliocentrism, to show that scientists often violate methodological rules to advance new ideas. The book critiques the privileged status of science in society and advocates for a free exchange of ideas. This edition is a gently read copy with tight binding and clean covers, making it a practical choice for readers interested in epistemology, scientific pluralism, and the limits of rationalism.
Who should read Against Method?
This book is essential for philosophy of science students, researchers, and academics exploring epistemology and scientific methodology. It suits readers interested in critiques of rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. Historians of science will value Feyerabend's case studies, while general readers with a background in philosophy will find his provocative style engaging. It is also recommended for those questioning the authority of science in modern society.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓ Groundbreaking critique of the scientific method that challenges conventional views
- ✓ Rich historical examples, especially the Galileo case, to illustrate arguments
- ✓ Engaging and provocative writing style that stimulates critical thinking
- ✓ Influential in philosophy, sociology, and history of science
- ✓ This copy is in good condition with tight binding and clean pages
Cons
- ✗ Some readers may find the anarchistic thesis overly radical or controversial
- ✗ The argumentation can be dense and requires familiarity with philosophy
- ✗ Critics argue it misrepresents the nature of scientific practice
- ✗ Not a practical guide for conducting scientific research
- ✗ The used copy may have previous owner markings or ex-library stamps
Similar books
Frequently asked questions
What is the main argument of Against Method?
Feyerabend argues that there is no universal scientific method; instead, science progresses best when methodological rules are sometimes violated, advocating an 'anything goes' approach.
Is this book suitable for beginners in philosophy?
It is accessible but assumes some background in philosophy or history of science; beginners may need supplementary reading.
What condition is this used copy in?
The description states it is gently read, with tight binding, straight spine, clean covers, and minimal signs of handling; it may have a previous owner's name or be ex-library.
Does Against Method focus on a specific scientific case?
Yes, it extensively discusses Galileo's defense of the Copernican system as a key example of methodological anarchism.
How does this edition differ from others?
This is the 2010 Verso edition (ISBN 9781844674428), which includes an introduction by Ian Hacking and is part of the Radical Thinkers series.
At Windsorbooks, we compare prices from trusted sellers so you can buy, rent, or sell textbooks at the best total price — shipping included.
As an Amazon Associate, Windsorbooks.com may earn a small commission on qualifying purchases.